Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Donn King's avatar

Hi, Loren! I must start with the clarifying statement that a question is just a question. I'm simply curious, not arguing, and I wanted to make sure I understood a side comment you made. You said, "I am continually perplexed that infant baptism isn’t a test of fellowship amongst conservative churches, but LGBTQ+ inclusion is—despite the former having arguably more theological weight." Are you thinking that "more theological weight" means that there is more fodder for discussion? Or that the gist of the theology would require infant baptism? Or that it would disallow infant baptism? I understand that you're saying it could arguably be a better test. I'm just not certain which side of the test would represent success. [smile] And, again, not trying to start an argument one way of the other—I can see both sides. I'm just curious. Thank you!

Expand full comment
Rob Scott's avatar

Any ideology mixed with Christianity renders the faith as something secondary and ultimately just a mask. We see this with "liberal" theology which throws out any talk of supernatural reality. And we see if with "conservative" theology which devolves into either isolation (The Benedict Option) or fascism/civil religion.

Expand full comment
32 more comments...

No posts